![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
As part of my final semester of graduate school, I continue to work with one of my professors to collect, abstract, and decipher research materials about, well, pretty much anything she's interested in. She's currently working on a pair of English plays from the Early Modern period, and how they treat concepts of female virginity and chastity. As a result, most of the books that I receive from interlibrary loan have some variation of the word "hymen" or "virginity" in the titles, which prompts a lot of raised eyebrows from the library staff (if they ever ask, I'm going to tell them I've got a "big weekend" planned). Anyway, so I'm reading all of this stuff, and the kinds of tests that have historically been done to prove/disprove female virginity are a joke. Here are some of my favourites:
You guys, I can't even.

In tractate Kethuboth [part of the Talmud], it is recorded that Rabbi Gamaliel performed a virginity test, calling for "two handmaids, one who is a virgin and who had intercourse with a man." The two women were placed upon a cask of wine. The Rabbi, we are told, was able to smell the fumes of the wine through he mouth of the nonvirgin; however, the wine was undetectable on the breath of the virgin.
The 13th century physician Guilielmus de Saliceto claimed that a virgin can be identified because she "urinates with a subtle hiss," while still other scholars and physicians declared that the urine of virgins was "clear and lucid, sometimes white, sometimes sparkling."
In De secretic mulierum, a prescribed test for determining the purity of a woman was to "grind up the flowers of a lily and the yellow particles in between the flowers, and give her this substance to eat. If she is corrupt, she will urinate immediately."
You guys, I can't even.

ia hugh laurie
Date: 2010-08-26 12:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:16 am (UTC)I took a great course about women in Early Modern plays in college and we talked a lot about the virgin/whore stuff.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:26 am (UTC)Massinger's great. A terrifically interesting life, too.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:13 am (UTC)I kind of want to say they should have gotten a hobby, but back then that was their hobby
no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:23 am (UTC)I'm just saying....
no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:24 am (UTC)In either sense of the word, it's hysterically funny.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 01:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 03:01 am (UTC)Still funny though :)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 03:50 am (UTC)I don't like the implications that my piss doesn't sparkle. It's offensive really. And seriously....wine fumes filtering up through the hoo-ha? There are no words.
"You've got wine on your breath! Where have you been sitting?!" LMFAO
no subject
Date: 2010-08-26 07:14 am (UTC)